10 Signs That Your Bad Habits May Be Part of a Psychological Disorder

Everyone has habits they wish they could break. The third coffee when two would have been enough. The phone-scrolling that stretches a five-minute distraction into an hour. The procrastination that converts manageable tasks into midnight emergencies. Most of the time, these patterns are exactly what they appear to be — ordinary human tendencies toward comfort, avoidance, and immediate gratification that respond to intention, structure, and modest effort. But sometimes, what looks like a bad habit is something more. Sometimes a pattern of behavior that resists every reasonable attempt at change, that escalates despite clear consequences, and that feels genuinely compulsive or impossible to control is not a character flaw or a discipline problem — it is a symptom.

The distinction between a bad habit and a symptom of a psychological disorder is not always obvious. Many psychological conditions present with behavioral patterns that look, from the outside, like poor choices or weak willpower. Compulsive eating, excessive drinking, chronic procrastination, compulsive skin-picking, pathological gambling, persistent avoidance of responsibilities, and cycles of impulsive decisions can all appear to be simple bad habits until they are understood within a larger psychological context. The person experiencing them often believes the same thing — and the resulting self-blame frequently makes both the psychological difficulty and the behavior worse.

This article identifies ten specific signs that a habit may be more than a habit — that it may be part of a broader psychological pattern worth understanding and, potentially, worth professional attention. None of these signs constitutes a diagnosis. What they constitute is a framework for more honest self-observation — the kind that replaces shame and self-recrimination with curiosity and, where needed, the decision to seek support. Understanding the psychology behind persistent behavioral patterns is the first step toward addressing them more effectively than willpower alone ever will.

Sign 1: The Habit Persists Despite Genuine Effort and Clear Negative Consequences

The clearest signal that a habit may be part of a psychological disorder is that it continues despite your genuine desire to stop it and despite consequences that clearly outweigh any benefit it provides. This is the core distinction between a bad habit and a compulsion, addiction, or symptom: ordinary habits respond to sufficient motivation and effort; psychological symptoms frequently do not.

Willpower-based models of behavior change, popularized in self-help literature, suggest that persistent unwanted behavior reflects insufficient motivation or resolve. But decades of research in clinical psychology tell a different story. Aaron Beck’s cognitive model — foundational to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) — distinguishes between behaviors maintained by conscious choice and behaviors maintained by automatic cognitive and emotional processes that operate below the level of deliberate decision. When a behavior is being driven by an automatic process — a compulsion, an addiction mechanism, an avoidance pattern reinforced by anxiety relief — the experience is one of losing the ability to choose, not of choosing badly.

The technical term in psychiatric nosology is ego-dystonic behavior: behavior that the individual recognizes as conflicting with their own values and desires but feels unable to control. This is different from ego-syntonic behavior, which feels consistent with one’s sense of self. Ego-dystonic behavioral patterns — “I don’t want to do this, I hate that I do this, and I cannot seem to stop” — are characteristic signatures of several psychological disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, eating disorders, substance use disorders, and impulse control disorders.

Practical takeaway: Honestly assess whether your efforts to change this behavior have been genuine — not just wishful — and whether consequences that would clearly motivate change in other areas of your life are failing to produce it here. If the answer is yes to both, the behavior warrants closer examination than the “try harder” framework provides.

Sign 2: The Habit Feels Driven by an Urge You Cannot Fully Control

When a behavior feels less like a choice and more like a compulsion — when there is a felt sense of drive, pressure, or urge that builds until the behavior is performed — that quality of driven-ness is psychologically significant.

This experience of urge-driven behavior is central to several recognized psychological conditions. In obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), as described in the foundational work of researchers including Paul Salkovskis and Stanley Rachman, compulsive behaviors are performed in response to obsessive thoughts or an intolerable feeling of tension that only the behavior can relieve — temporarily. In substance use disorders, the craving state involves neurobiological changes in reward circuitry — particularly dopamine pathways in the nucleus accumbens — that produce a compelling drive toward the substance that goes well beyond ordinary desire. In body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) such as trichotillomania (compulsive hair-pulling) and excoriation disorder (compulsive skin-picking), the urge preceding the behavior is characteristically described as nearly irresistible, followed by relief and often shame.

The phenomenology of these urges is distinctive. They tend to build in intensity when resisted. They are typically associated with emotional states — anxiety, boredom, tension, dysphoria — that the behavior temporarily modulates. They produce a specific quality of relief or release when acted upon that ordinary chosen behaviors do not. And they are followed, in many cases, by regret or shame that does nothing to reduce the likelihood of their recurrence.

This cycle — trigger, urge, behavior, relief, shame — is the functional signature of compulsive behavior patterns, and recognizing it in one’s own experience is clinically meaningful.

Practical takeaway: Notice whether the habit is associated with a felt urge that precedes it and a felt release that follows it. If that urge-relief cycle is present and consistent, the behavior is not primarily about choice — it is about urge regulation, which requires different strategies than resolution and self-discipline.

Sign 3: The Habit Is Getting Worse Over Time, Not Better

Bad habits tend to be relatively stable — they occupy a consistent place in a person’s behavioral repertoire without necessarily escalating. Symptoms of psychological disorders often escalate. The progressive quality of a behavior — the way it gradually demands more, occupies more time and attention, and produces less satisfying relief than it once did — is a meaningful warning signal.

Tolerance is the technical term for this escalation pattern in the context of substance use disorders: the phenomenon in which the same amount of a substance produces diminishing effects over time, requiring increasing quantities to achieve the same outcome. But tolerance-like escalation occurs in non-substance behavioral patterns as well. Pathological gambling tends to escalate in bet size and frequency. Compulsive exercise in the context of exercise addiction or eating disorders tends to require increasing duration and intensity. Binge eating patterns often involve progressive increases in the amount consumed before satiety is achieved.

Jerome Kagan’s developmental research on behavioral inhibition and Marsha Linehan’s biosocial theory of borderline personality development both describe how behavioral patterns that initially serve adaptive functions — reducing anxiety, managing emotional pain, providing a sense of control — can become increasingly entrenched over time as the nervous system adapts to them and other coping strategies atrophy from disuse. The behavior that once worked well enough at a lower intensity no longer works at that level, producing escalation not through greater enjoyment but through greater need.

Practical takeaway: Chart the trajectory of the behavior honestly over the past year or two years. Is it stable, diminishing, or escalating? Escalation — in frequency, intensity, or the consequences it produces — is a significant signal that the behavior is operating on a different kind of logic than ordinary habit.

Sign 4: The Habit Is Your Primary Strategy for Managing Difficult Emotions

When a behavior becomes the default — or the only — response to emotional distress, that functional role is itself a signal worth taking seriously.

Marsha Linehan’s biosocial theory, which underpins Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), proposes that many harmful behavioral patterns develop as emotional regulation strategies in people with high emotional sensitivity who have not had adequate support in developing more adaptive regulation skills. The behavior — whether drinking, bingeing, self-injury, compulsive internet use, or risky sexual behavior — works, in the short term. It reduces emotional pain, provides a sense of relief or numbness, or generates stimulation that overrides an intolerable emotional state. This functional effectiveness is precisely what makes it so difficult to relinquish without alternative regulation strategies to replace it.

Steven Hayes’ Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) framework describes this phenomenon as experiential avoidance — the attempt to suppress, escape from, or alter difficult internal experiences (emotions, thoughts, sensations, memories) through behavioral strategies. Research consistently shows that experiential avoidance, while temporarily effective at reducing emotional discomfort, maintains and amplifies psychological distress over time — precisely because the avoided emotional experience never gets processed and resolved, and the avoidance behavior itself becomes an additional source of shame and self-criticism.

The practical marker is whether you use the behavior specifically when you are anxious, sad, angry, bored, ashamed, or overwhelmed — and whether the emotional relief it provides, however temporary, is the primary reason you keep doing it despite consequences.

Practical takeaway: For one week, notice the emotional state that immediately precedes each instance of the habit. If a consistent emotional trigger emerges — if the behavior reliably follows anxiety, boredom, loneliness, or distress — it is functioning as an emotional regulation strategy, not simply as a habit. This shifts the intervention target from behavior change to emotion regulation skill-building.

Sign 5: The Habit Is Accompanied by Persistent Shame, Secrecy, or Hiding

Shame and secrecy are not inevitable companions of bad habits. Someone who habitually bites their nails or spends too long on their phone might feel mild embarrassment but typically does not hide these behaviors or experience intense shame about them. When a behavior produces significant shame, is carefully concealed from others, and generates fear of discovery — that affective signature is itself diagnostically informative.

Shame-driven secrecy characterizes a number of psychological conditions. Binge eating disorder involves episodes of eating that are typically conducted in secret, accompanied by intense shame and self-disgust that are disproportionate to the act of eating and that are qualitatively different from ordinary guilt about dietary choices. Body dysmorphic disorder — described in detail by Katharine Phillips in her clinical research — involves intense shame about perceived physical flaws and elaborate concealment behaviors. Compulsive sexual behavior disorder involves sexual activities accompanied by shame and secrecy that significantly exceed what the person considers consistent with their own values. Substance use disorders frequently involve elaborate concealment from family, colleagues, and healthcare providers.

The psychological function of shame-driven secrecy matters here. Shame, unlike guilt, does not target a specific behavior — it targets the self. Brené Brown’s extensive research on shame identifies it as the feeling that “I am bad” rather than “I did something bad.” This self-attacking quality means that shame about a behavior rarely motivates change — it more frequently produces either paralysis, increased concealment, or cycles of the very behavior it accompanies, as the person attempts to manage the pain of shame through the same behavior that generated it.

Practical takeaway: Notice whether the behavior generates shame that feels out of proportion to its objective harm, and whether it leads you to hide aspects of your life from people whose judgment or support you would otherwise value. Disproportionate shame and strategic secrecy are worth bringing into a therapeutic conversation — not because they make you bad, but because they indicate the behavior has taken on a psychological significance that goes beyond simple habit.

Sign 6: The Habit Disrupts Your Sleep, Relationships, or Ability to Function

One of the clearest clinical indicators that any pattern of behavior has crossed from lifestyle challenge to psychological concern is functional impairment — consistent disruption to one or more major domains of life: sleep, relationships, work, physical health, or daily self-care.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) both include functional impairment as a required criterion for most psychological disorder diagnoses — precisely because the line between variant behavior and clinically significant disturbance runs through its impact on functioning. This is not an arbitrary threshold. It reflects the recognition that psychological conditions become disorders when they prevent people from living the lives they want to live.

Functional impairment takes many forms. Sleep disruption — staying up compulsively engaging in an activity, being unable to sleep because of intrusive thoughts related to the behavior, or using substances that chemically disrupt sleep architecture — is both a consequence of many behavioral patterns and a driver of worsening psychological distress. Relationship impairment — when a behavior consistently generates conflict, when it is prioritized over relational commitments, or when it drives withdrawal and isolation — erodes the social support that is one of the most robust protective factors against psychological deterioration. Occupational impairment — missed deadlines, reduced performance, absenteeism — represents a measurable consequence that people often try to explain away until it becomes undeniable.

Practical takeaway: Honestly inventory which domains of your life the behavior has consistently affected in the past six months. Not occasional minor effects — consistent, recurring impacts. The number and severity of affected domains is a direct measure of clinical significance.

Sign 7: The Habit Follows Predictable Cycles of Indulgence, Guilt, and Resolution That Never Stick

Many people are familiar with a particular pattern: the behavior occurs, is followed by guilt or shame, produces a firm resolution to stop, holds for some period, and then the behavior occurs again — with the cycle repeating indefinitely without permanent change. This cycle is not evidence of weak character. It is the behavioral signature of several psychological disorders, and it has specific psychological mechanics that explain why resolution alone cannot break it.

Albert Bandura’s research on self-efficacy is relevant here. Each failure of resolution — each time the firm commitment dissolves into the behavior — reduces self-efficacy for change, which in turn reduces the genuine effort applied to subsequent attempts. Over time, people begin making resolutions they no longer truly believe in, which are correspondingly more fragile. The cycle becomes self-reinforcing not because the person lacks commitment but because repeated failure has produced learned helplessness about this specific domain.

This cycle is particularly characteristic of eating disorders — especially binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa, where Christopher Fairburn’s transdiagnostic cognitive model identifies dietary restriction as the trigger for binge episodes, which are followed by guilt and renewed restriction, perpetuating the cycle. It also characterizes many patterns of problematic substance use, compulsive spending, and other impulse control difficulties. In all these cases, the cycle itself is part of the disorder’s maintenance mechanism — and breaking the cycle requires addressing the underlying psychological processes that drive it, not simply strengthening the resolution.

Practical takeaway: Count the number of genuine resolutions you have made about this behavior and estimate how long the longest one held. If you have made multiple sincere, effortful attempts that all eventually collapsed, you are almost certainly dealing with something that requires a different approach than personal resolve — and very likely one that would benefit from professional support.

Sign 8: The Habit Is Connected to Intrusive Thoughts You Cannot Dismiss

When a behavior is preceded or accompanied by intrusive, unwanted, or obsessive thoughts — thoughts that enter awareness unbidden, feel impossible to dismiss, and drive the behavior as a response — that cognitive pattern points toward specific psychological conditions that have well-established treatments.

Intrusive thoughts are universal — virtually all human beings experience unwanted mental content. But most people are able to let intrusive thoughts pass without acting on them or experiencing significant distress. In obsessive-compulsive disorder, Paul Salkovskis’ cognitive model identifies the crucial variable as the interpretation of intrusive thoughts — specifically, when people appraise their intrusive thoughts as personally significant, threatening, or indicative of something terrible about themselves, the resulting anxiety drives compulsive behaviors performed to neutralize the perceived threat. The thoughts feel impossible to dismiss because of the meaning attributed to them, not because of their objective content.

In other conditions, the thought-behavior connection takes different forms. Body dysmorphic disorder involves preoccupying, repetitive thoughts about perceived physical flaws that drive checking, grooming, camouflage, and avoidance behaviors. Health anxiety involves intrusive thoughts about illness that drive reassurance-seeking and checking. Eating disorders involve intrusive thoughts about food, body, and weight that drive restrictive, compensatory, or binge behaviors. In all these cases, the thoughts are as much a part of the disorder as the behaviors — and addressing behavior without addressing the thought patterns that drive it produces limited and fragile change.

Practical takeaway: Notice the cognitive content that accompanies the habit. Is there a recurring thought, fear, or image that precedes or drives it? Does the behavior feel like a response to a mental state rather than simply a behavioral choice? If the thought-behavior link is present and consistent, therapeutic approaches that address cognitive content — particularly CBT and Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) — are specifically designed for this pattern.

Sign 9: The Habit Has Replaced Activities and Relationships That Used to Matter

Behavioral patterns that expand to fill the space previously occupied by relationships, hobbies, professional engagement, and life meaning are demonstrating one of the most clinically significant features of behavioral addiction and mood-related disorders: the progressive narrowing of the life space around the problematic behavior.

This narrowing — technically called salience in addiction research — describes the phenomenon in which a behavior becomes so dominant in a person’s cognitive and motivational world that other potential sources of reward and meaning progressively lose their appeal and are ultimately abandoned. Mark Griffiths’ components model of addiction identifies salience as one of six core components, alongside mood modification, tolerance, withdrawal, conflict, and relapse. When a behavior has achieved salience — when it has become the primary organizing principle of daily life — the person has effectively lost access to the motivational diversity that characterizes healthy functioning.

Depression also produces a version of this narrowing through a mechanism of behavioral withdrawal. Peter Lewinsohn’s behavioral activation model identifies the progressive reduction of engagement in rewarding activities as both a consequence and a maintaining cause of depression: as depression deepens, the motivation to engage with previously valued activities diminishes, the activities are abandoned, and the resulting reduction in positive reinforcement deepens the depression further. What appears as a “habit” of inactivity or withdrawal may be the behavioral expression of depressive anhedonia — the reduced capacity to experience pleasure that is a hallmark symptom of major depressive disorder.

Practical takeaway: List five activities or relationships that you genuinely valued two years ago. Honestly assess the degree to which the current habit has displaced each of them. Progressive displacement of valued life content by a single behavioral pattern is one of the clearest markers of clinical significance available to honest self-observation.

Sign 10: People Who Know You Well Have Expressed Concern About This Behavior

This sign is perhaps the most uncomfortable to sit with — and often the most important. When people who know us well, who care about us, and who have no obvious ulterior motive for their concern repeatedly raise the same behavioral pattern, their observations deserve genuine consideration rather than reflexive dismissal.

People living with psychological conditions that influence behavior are often the last to accurately perceive the full impact of those behaviors — not through dishonesty but through the ordinary perceptual limitations of proximity and the motivated cognition that protects self-image. This is not a character flaw. It is a well-documented phenomenon in clinical psychology sometimes called anosognosia in its neurological forms and, more broadly, impaired insight in psychological disorder contexts. Substance use disorders, bipolar disorder, and eating disorders in particular are associated with limited insight into the nature and extent of the behavioral pattern.

Trusted others — partners, close friends, family members, therapists — observe behavioral patterns from a vantage point that is simply not available to the person inside them. They see consistency where the individual sees exceptions. They observe impact on the relationship that the individual minimizes. They notice escalation over time that is difficult to perceive from inside the gradual change. This does not mean all expressed concern is accurate or well-motivated — but when concern is repeated, comes from multiple sources, and involves people with genuine knowledge of and care for you, dismissing it without serious reflection is worth examining as a behavior in itself.

Practical takeaway: If someone you trust has expressed concern about a behavioral pattern more than once, try to listen to the specific observations rather than the evaluation. What exactly have they noticed? When? The factual content of their concern — separate from any judgment attached to it — is data about your own behavior that you may not be able to generate from inside the pattern.

What to Do When You Recognize These Signs in Yourself

Recognizing that a habit may be part of a psychological pattern is not a reason for alarm — it is a reason for a different kind of engagement with the problem than willpower and self-recrimination have been providing. These signs are not a checklist for self-diagnosis. They are invitations to honest self-inquiry and, where the pattern is causing consistent distress or impairment, to professional support.

1. Start with honest self-observation, not judgment. Before drawing conclusions, spend time observing the behavior with genuine curiosity: when does it occur, what triggers it, what function does it serve, and what has happened when you have tried to change it? Accurate observation is the foundation of effective response.
2. Consult a mental health professional. A psychologist, psychiatrist, or licensed therapist can provide assessment, accurate conceptualization of the pattern, and evidence-based intervention — whether that is CBT, DBT, ACT, exposure-based approaches, or other modalities specifically designed for the pattern in question. Seeking this support is not a concession of weakness — it is the most intelligent response to a problem that has not responded to your current approaches.
3. Separate the behavior from your identity. The behavior pattern, even if it turns out to be symptomatic of a psychological disorder, is not who you are. It is a pattern that developed for reasons, is maintained by identifiable mechanisms, and can be addressed with appropriate support. The shift from “I am broken” to “I have a pattern that has a cause and a solution” is not merely semantic — it is the cognitive reframe that makes genuine change possible.
4. Reduce shame through honest connection. Shame thrives in isolation and secrecy. Trusted disclosure — whether to a therapist, a support group, or a close friend — reduces the psychological weight of shame and begins the process of developing a more compassionate relationship with the self that the behavior is, in many cases, attempting to protect.
5. Focus on building alternative coping strategies, not just eliminating the behavior. Because many of the patterns described here serve genuine emotional regulation functions, successful change typically requires developing alternative strategies for the emotional needs the behavior has been meeting — not simply removing the behavior and leaving the underlying need unaddressed.

FAQs about Signs That Bad Habits May Be Part of a Psychological Disorder

How do I know if my bad habit is a psychological disorder or just a habit?

The key distinctions are persistence despite genuine effort, escalation over time, functional impairment across major life domains, and the felt quality of compulsion or loss of control. A bad habit responds to sufficient motivation, structure, and consistent effort. A symptom of a psychological disorder characteristically resists these approaches because it is being maintained by automatic cognitive and emotional processes — compulsive urges, anxiety-driven avoidance, addiction mechanisms, mood-related behavioral withdrawal — that operate below the level of deliberate choice. The presence of significant distress, secrecy, shame disproportionate to the behavior’s actual harm, and repeated failed genuine attempts to change are all indicators worth bringing to a mental health professional for proper assessment. Self-diagnosis is not the goal — informed self-observation followed by professional consultation is.

Can a bad habit turn into a psychological disorder over time?

The boundary between habits and disorder symptoms is not always fixed — and some behavioral patterns can develop, through escalation and reinforcement, into patterns that meet clinical criteria for psychological conditions. Occasional heavy drinking can escalate into alcohol use disorder. Stress-driven overeating can develop into binge eating disorder. Habitual worry can intensify into generalized anxiety disorder. The developmental trajectory typically involves the behavior becoming progressively more compulsive, more central to emotional regulation, more impervious to voluntary control, and more costly in terms of functioning and wellbeing. Understanding this trajectory is not meant to generate alarm about every unwanted habit — it is meant to encourage earlier attention to patterns that are showing signs of escalation, when intervention is considerably more straightforward than it becomes once patterns are entrenched.

Which psychological disorders most commonly present as bad habits?

Several psychological disorders frequently present initially as behavioral patterns that are interpreted as habits or personal failures rather than symptoms. Obsessive-compulsive disorder manifests as compulsive rituals that appear as quirks or excessive tidiness. Binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa present as “overeating” or “lack of discipline.” Substance use disorders present as “drinking too much” or “not being able to say no.” Body-focused repetitive behaviors (trichotillomania, excoriation disorder) present as nervous habits. ADHD presents as chronic procrastination and disorganization. Major depressive disorder presents as lethargy, withdrawal, and loss of motivation. Pathological gambling presents as a gambling “problem.” What these conditions share is that their behavioral expression is visible and identifiable while the underlying psychological mechanisms driving the behavior remain unrecognized — which is precisely why accurate psychological conceptualization changes both how the person understands themselves and what interventions can actually help.

Is it possible to overcome these patterns without professional help?

For milder presentations and in people with strong existing psychological resources and social support, some improvement through self-directed work is possible — structured self-help materials based on CBT, mindfulness-based approaches, and peer support communities can all contribute meaningfully to change. However, for patterns that meet the signs described in this article — particularly significant functional impairment, a long history of failed genuine change attempts, strong urge-driven quality, and connection to significant emotional distress — professional support typically produces substantially better outcomes than self-directed approaches alone. This is not because people cannot change without therapy, but because the specific mechanisms maintaining clinical-level behavioral patterns — cognitive distortions, emotional regulation deficits, conditioning processes, neurobiological factors — respond most reliably to evidence-based therapeutic interventions that are designed to address those mechanisms directly.

What should I say to a mental health professional when I’m not sure if my habit is a disorder?

You do not need certainty before seeking professional input — in fact, bringing the uncertainty itself is entirely appropriate. A straightforward starting point is simply describing the behavior, its history, what you have tried, and what the impact has been on your life and wellbeing. A skilled mental health professional will ask the assessment questions needed to understand the pattern more fully. You might say: “I have this pattern of behavior that I have genuinely tried to change and haven’t been able to. It’s affecting [specific areas of life], and I want to understand what’s maintaining it and what approaches might actually work.” That framing — curious and honest rather than self-condemning or minimizing — typically opens a productive assessment conversation. You do not need to arrive with a self-diagnosis. You need to arrive with honest observations and openness to understanding what you are dealing with more accurately.

Can childhood experiences cause habits that are actually psychological disorder symptoms?

Yes — and this connection is one of the most robustly supported findings in developmental and clinical psychology. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) — including emotional neglect, physical or psychological abuse, household instability, and early loss — are associated with substantially elevated rates of a wide range of psychological conditions in adulthood, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders, and personality disorders. The mechanism involves the developing nervous system adapting to environments of chronic threat, deprivation, or emotional dysregulation in ways that produce lasting changes in stress response systems, attachment patterns, emotional regulation capacity, and self-concept. Bessel van der Kolk’s research on developmental trauma illuminates how these early experiences become encoded not just in memory but in the nervous system — and why behavioral patterns that emerged as adaptations to difficult early environments can persist as symptoms long after the original conditions have changed. Understanding this developmental context reduces self-blame and opens more effective therapeutic pathways.

Bibliography

• Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression. Guilford Press.
• Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
• Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 571–583.
• Rachman, S. (1997). A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(9), 793–802.
• Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Eating Disorders. Guilford Press.
• Phillips, K. A. (2005). The Broken Mirror: Understanding and Treating Body Dysmorphic Disorder. Oxford University Press.
• Griffiths, M. D. (2005). A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.
• Brown, B. (2010). The Gifts of Imperfection. Hazelden.
• van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.
• Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974). A behavioral approach to depression. In R. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary Theory and Research. Wiley.
• Kagan, J. (1994). Galen’s Prophecy: Temperament in Human Nature. Basic Books.
• American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text rev.). APA Publishing.
• Felitti, V. J., & Anda, R. F. (2010). The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult medical disease, psychiatric disorders, and sexual behavior. In R. A. Lanius, E. Vermetten, & C. Pain (Eds.), The Impact of Early Life Trauma on Health and Disease. Cambridge University Press.