​The 5 Lobes of the Brain and Their Different Functions

In September 1848, a railroad foreman named Phineas Gage packed blasting powder into a rock, and a spark set it off. A three-foot iron rod shot up through his left cheek and out the top of his skull. He sat up, spoke, and walked to a cart. Within hours, the odd question had already formed: what, exactly, had that rod gone through, and why did he seem so much like himself and so little like himself at the same time?

A century and a half of neuroscience later, we can answer in more detail. The brain isn’t one undifferentiated mass of thinking tissue. It’s organized into regions that handle different jobs, and the largest-scale division is into lobes: the frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and insular lobes. Where an injury lands changes what it does, and sometimes in ways that sound like science fiction, like losing the left half of the world or the ability to recognize your own mother’s face.

The lobes are real, useful, and, as we’ll see, much too tidy.

No lobe works alone.

This article covers the 5 lobes of the brain and their different functions, the classic evidence behind each, what happens when one is damaged, and the myths worth dropping.

What are the 5 lobes of the brain?

The cerebral cortex, the wrinkled outer layer of the brain, is divided into five lobes in each hemisphere: the frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and insular lobes. Many textbooks teach four, leaving out the insula, which is tucked inside the lateral sulcus and covered by neighboring regions. Some sources count the limbic lobe as the fifth instead, so the number depends on who is drawing the map.

The boundaries come from landmark grooves. The central sulcus separates the frontal lobe in front from the parietal lobe behind. The lateral sulcus (the Sylvian fissure) separates the temporal lobe below from the frontal and parietal lobes above. The occipital lobe sits at the back, defined partly by the parieto-occipital sulcus. The insula lies hidden in the depths of the lateral sulcus, covered by flaps of cortex called opercula that belong to the frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes.

Both hemispheres have all five lobes. In roughly 90 to 95 percent of people, the left hemisphere is dominant for language, and the right tends to be more proficient at spatial and some creative tasks, though both sides participate in nearly everything.

A few cautions before we go lobe by lobe. First, the functions listed are the headline roles, and every lobe does far more. Second, the labels reflect anatomy, not necessarily function, because the lines on the map were drawn by early anatomists based on folds, not by neuroscientists based on what each region computes. Third, almost every complex task, from reading a menu to comforting a friend, recruits several lobes working together.

Think of the lobes as neighborhoods in a big city. Each has a character and typical industries, but nobody can get through their day without crossing district lines.

What does the frontal lobe do?

Everything you’d call planning, deciding, and acting on purpose. The frontal lobe, which makes up roughly a third of the cortex and sits behind the forehead, controls voluntary movement, speech production, attention, working memory, and executive functions: the skills of setting goals, holding back impulses, and adjusting behavior to circumstances.

The rear edge of the frontal lobe holds the primary motor cortex, in the precentral gyrus, which sends commands to muscles on the opposite side of the body. Just ahead are premotor and supplementary motor areas that help plan and sequence movements. In the left inferior frontal region of most people sits Broca’s area, which supports the production of fluent speech, and damage here can leave someone who understands language but struggles to say what they mean.

The front-most part, the prefrontal cortex, does the heavy lifting of judgment and self-control. It continues to mature into the mid-twenties, according to brain imaging studies, which is one reason teenagers and young adults can know the rules and still make impulsive choices. That’s a general trend, not an excuse, and individuals vary a great deal.

No account of the frontal lobe is complete without Phineas Gage. His physician, John Martyn Harlow, wrote up the case in 1868, describing a man who had been efficient and well-liked before the accident and afterward seemed fitful, irreverent, and unable to stick to plans. In 1994, Hanna Damasio and colleagues used computer reconstruction of Gage’s skull to estimate the path of the rod, concluding that it likely damaged prefrontal regions in both hemispheres.

But the popular story has grown taller than the facts. Historian Malcolm Macmillan, who spent decades on the case in his book An Odd Kind of Fame, argues that the caricature of Gage as a drunken, violent drifter is not supported by the evidence, and that the personality changes reported by Harlow appear to have faded considerably over time. Gage later worked as a long-distance stagecoach driver in Chile, a job requiring planning and social skill. Early reports are the best sources, and later retellings embroidered them.

What survives of the case is the central insight: damage to the frontal lobes can alter judgment, impulse control, and social behavior without erasing basic intelligence or memory. Clinicians still see this pattern in people with frontal injuries, strokes, and certain dementias, such as frontotemporal dementia.

Imagine Dara (an illustrative composite), whose father, a careful accountant, begins making reckless purchases and telling crude jokes at dinner after a stroke. He passes memory tests and can do arithmetic, so the family can’t understand what has changed. A neurologist explains that his frontal circuitry for inhibition and planning was affected. That explanation doesn’t remove the pain, but it removes the blame.

What’s one decision you made today that depended on holding back a first impulse?

What does the parietal lobe do?

It tells you where your body is, what it’s touching, and where things are around you. The parietal lobe integrates sensory information, especially touch, body position, and space, and it supports attention and the sense that you are located somewhere in a world of objects.

At its front edge, behind the central sulcus, lies the primary somatosensory cortex in the postcentral gyrus, which receives touch, temperature, pain, and body-position signals from the opposite side of the body. Further back, the superior and inferior parietal lobules handle higher-order tasks such as combining sensory inputs, reaching for objects, tracking where things are, and directing attention.

Neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield mapped much of this territory. In a landmark 1937 paper with Edwin Boldrey, he reported electrical stimulation of the exposed brains of patients undergoing surgery for epilepsy, noting which body parts responded or felt sensations. The result was the famous homunculus, a distorted “little man” drawn with enormous hands, lips, and tongue and a tiny trunk, reflecting how much cortical territory is devoted to each body part. The face and hands occupy disproportionate space because they require fine sensation and control.

The picture has since been refined: body maps in the brain are more complex and overlapping than the original cartoon implied, and some of Penfield’s proposed maps, such as a whole-body representation on the medial wall of the parietal lobe, have never been confirmed. Still, the principle holds up: the brain allocates space by importance, not by physical size.

Parietal damage produces some of neurology’s strangest syndromes. The best known is hemispatial neglect, most often following damage to the right parietal region, in which a person fails to notice or respond to things on the left side of space. Patients may eat food from only the right half of a plate, shave only one side of the face, or draw only half of a clock, and they often don’t realize anything is wrong. It’s not blindness, and their eyes and sensory pathways are intact. The brain’s map of space has lost half its territory.

Another example is Gerstmann syndrome, associated with damage to the left parietal region, which can include trouble with finger recognition, writing, arithmetic, and telling left from right.

Consider Hal (an illustrative composite), who survives a right-hemisphere stroke and insists he’s fine, even as he bumps into door frames on the left and leaves his left sock on the bed. His wife places his coffee on the right, and he drinks it happily. He isn’t being stubborn. He literally doesn’t have a left side of the world to attend to, and rehabilitation will focus on teaching him to scan leftward on purpose.

The parietal lobe, in short, builds your sense of being a body in space. Lose part of it, and that sense can crumble in bizarre ways.

What does the temporal lobe do?

Hearing, language comprehension, memory, and recognizing what you’re looking at. The temporal lobe sits above the ears and below the lateral sulcus, and it houses the auditory cortex, parts of the language comprehension network, the hippocampus (essential for forming new memories), and the amygdala (central to emotional processing).

The primary auditory cortex lies on Heschl’s gyrus, on the upper surface of the superior temporal gyrus. Nearby, in the left hemisphere of most people, is Wernicke’s area, which supports understanding of spoken and written language. Damage here can produce fluent but nonsensical speech and poor comprehension, a pattern that contrasts with Broca’s aphasia in the frontal lobe.

The lower temporal lobe contributes to recognizing faces and objects. Damage to certain regions can cause prosopagnosia (face blindness), where a person can see a face clearly but can’t tell who it is.

The medial temporal lobe made neuroscience history through one patient. In 1953, surgeon William Scoville removed portions of both medial temporal lobes from a young man named Henry Molaison, known in the literature as H.M., to treat severe epilepsy. The operation reduced his seizures but left him unable to form new lasting memories. In a landmark 1957 report, William B. Scoville and Brenda Milner described the loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions, concluding that medial temporal structures are essential to forming new memories. H.M. could converse, remember his childhood, and learn certain motor skills, yet forgot what he’d eaten for lunch minutes later.

A different line of work involved monkeys. In 1939, Heinrich Klüver and Paul C. Bucy reported that removing both temporal lobes in monkeys produced a striking syndrome: the animals became tame and unafraid, examined objects with their mouths, lost the ability to recognize what objects meant (a kind of “psychic blindness”), and showed excessive and altered sexual behavior. The pattern, now called Klüver-Bucy syndrome, has been described in humans after bilateral temporal damage from causes such as encephalitis or head injury, though full-blown cases are rare. The effects are linked especially to the amygdala and surrounding structures.

Take Maya (an illustrative composite), a woman recovering from herpes simplex encephalitis, which often targets the temporal lobes. She can speak and walk, but her family notices she no longer remembers new conversations, and she gets confused by familiar objects. The infection scarred the very structures that H.M.’s surgery removed.

Temporal lobe epilepsy adds another dimension: seizures originating here can produce déjà vu, strange smells, sudden fear, or a sensation of unreality. People who experience these symptoms should see a neurologist, because they can be treated.

What does the occipital lobe do?

Seeing. The occipital lobe, at the back of the head, is the brain’s primary visual processing center. Light hits the retina, signals travel through the optic nerves and the thalamus, and arrive at the primary visual cortex (V1), tucked along the calcarine sulcus on the occipital lobe’s medial surface.

The key discoveries about how V1 works came from David H. Hubel and Torsten N. Wiesel, who in the late 1950s and early 1960s recorded from individual neurons in the visual cortex of cats. Their 1962 paper in the Journal of Physiology described cells that respond best to lines or edges of a particular orientation, and others that respond to movement in a particular direction. They distinguished “simple” and “complex” cells, a hierarchy suggesting that the cortex builds up complex images from simple features. Their work earned a Nobel Prize in 1981.

It’s a lovely finding, and a bit of a caution about our intuitions: you don’t experience the world as lines and edges, but your first stage of visual cortex does. Assembling those fragments into a face, a coffee cup, or a sunset takes many more stages, and those involve other lobes.

The visual field is mapped across V1 in a particular way. Each hemisphere receives information from the opposite half of the visual field, so damage to the left occipital lobe can cause loss of the right half of vision in both eyes, a condition called homonymous hemianopia. A stroke affecting both occipital lobes can cause cortical blindness, where the eyes work but the brain can’t process what they send. Strikingly, some people with cortical blindness can still respond to visual stimuli without conscious awareness, a phenomenon called blindsight.

Secondary visual areas surrounding V1 handle color, motion, depth, and shape, feeding information forward to the temporal and parietal lobes. Damage to those higher regions can yield visual agnosia, where a person sees but can’t recognize objects. Perception, it turns out, is a multi-step production.

Imagine Ivan (an illustrative composite), who has a small stroke in his right occipital cortex and suddenly can’t see anything on his left. He first assumes the lights have gone out in half the room. His doctor tests his visual fields and finds a clear cut. His eyes are fine; the damage is farther back.

Migraine auras, those shimmering zigzag patterns that precede some headaches, are thought to involve waves of altered activity spreading across the visual cortex. A reminder that vision happens in the brain, not the eyes.

What does the insular lobe do?

It tells you how your body feels from the inside, and it helps turn those feelings into emotion and awareness. The insula, a hidden island of cortex folded deep within the lateral sulcus, is central to interoception (sensing your internal bodily state), taste, pain, disgust, and the felt quality of emotion.

Neuroanatomist A. D. (Bud) Craig laid out an influential account in a 2002 paper in Nature Reviews Neuroscience titled “How do you feel?” He described interoception as the sense of the physiological condition of the body, and argued that signals about heartbeat, temperature, pain, gut sensations, and more are relayed to the insula, where they are re-represented, particularly in the anterior insula, as the basis of subjective feelings. In his later work, he proposed that the anterior insula may be important for awareness itself. That’s a bold hypothesis that remains debated, but there’s wide agreement that the insula is crucial to feeling states.

The insula also participates in what’s known as the salience network, which helps the brain decide what deserves attention, particularly when something is emotionally or bodily significant. It’s active when you feel pain, but also when you see someone else in pain, which has made it a candidate for part of the neural basis of empathy. It also responds to disgust, whether from a rotten smell or a moral violation.

Clinical findings add to the picture. Some studies of people with strokes involving the insula found they were more likely to quit smoking easily, suggesting the insula is involved in the felt urge to use substances. The finding is intriguing but comes from small samples, and the insula’s role in addiction is still being worked out. Altered insula activity has also been reported in anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and chronic pain, though such studies show associations in groups, not diagnostic tests for individuals.

Picture Lena (an illustrative composite), who walks into a crowded subway car and feels her heart racing, a tight chest, a dry mouth. Before she’s consciously decided she’s anxious, her insula is already compiling the body’s alarm signals into a feeling. Whether she interprets it as danger or as excitement depends on other brain regions and her past experience.

It’s also worth noting that not every textbook treats the insula as a lobe in its own right. Some describe it as a part of the temporal or frontal lobe, or group it with the limbic system. The label matters less than the function: this small region is a hub where body and feeling meet.

Ask yourself: when did you last feel your heartbeat? That’s your insula at work.

How do the lobes work together?

Through networks, not separate modules. Even the simplest act, such as catching a ball, recruits visual, parietal, frontal, and cerebellar systems in a coordinated chain, and complex tasks like reading, driving, or having a conversation involve most of the cortex.

The clearest illustration is the visual system, which splits into two main pathways after leaving the occipital lobe. In an influential 1982 chapter, Leslie G. Ungerleider and Mortimer Mishkin proposed that a ventral stream running down into the temporal lobe handles object identification (the “what” pathway), while a dorsal stream running up into the parietal lobe handles spatial location (the “where” pathway). Their evidence came from monkeys with lesions in the different regions.

Later, Melvyn A. Goodale and A. David Milner proposed a reinterpretation in their 1992 paper in Trends in Neurosciences: the ventral stream supports conscious perception, while the dorsal stream guides action, a “what versus how” distinction. Their key evidence came from a patient with damage to the ventral stream who couldn’t consciously recognize the orientation of a slot but could accurately post a card through it. The two accounts differ in emphasis, and both remain influential. Researchers continue to debate how separate the streams are, with growing evidence for extensive cross-talk.

The lesson is that perception isn’t a single process. It’s a collaboration, and different lobes contribute different skills. The occipital lobe supplies raw visual signals, the temporal lobe names the object, the parietal lobe positions it in space and guides the hand, and the frontal lobe decides whether to reach for it.

Language works similarly. Hearing a sentence recruits the temporal lobe’s auditory and comprehension areas; producing a reply recruits frontal regions; reading engages the occipital and parietal lobes for visual and orthographic processing; and the insula and frontal motor regions coordinate the muscles of speech.

Modern neuroscience increasingly emphasizes large-scale networks that span lobes, such as the default mode network (active during rest and self-reflective thought), the salience network (centered on the insula), and the frontoparietal control network (supporting flexible problem solving). These networks help explain why a small lesion can have widespread effects, and why different injuries can produce overlapping symptoms.

The lobe map remains a useful atlas. Just don’t mistake it for an org chart in which each department works in isolation.

What happens when a lobe is damaged?

The effects depend on which lobe, which side, how large the injury is, and what caused it. Strokes, head injuries, tumors, infections, and neurodegenerative diseases all can damage the lobes, and symptoms often point to the affected region, which is how neurologists localize problems.

Classic patterns include:

• Frontal lobe damage can cause changes in planning, motivation, and impulse control; difficulty speaking fluently (Broca’s aphasia); or weakness on the opposite side of the body.
• Parietal lobe damage can cause hemispatial neglect, trouble with spatial navigation, difficulty combining touch with recognition, or Gerstmann-type problems with writing and calculation.
• Temporal lobe damage can impair hearing and language comprehension (Wernicke’s aphasia), memory formation, face recognition, or emotional regulation, and may cause seizures.
• Occipital lobe damage can cause loss of part or all of the visual field, difficulty recognizing objects, or visual hallucinations.
• Insular damage is less clearly defined but may affect taste, pain perception, body awareness, and emotional experience.

Specific symptoms depend heavily on whether the left or right hemisphere is affected. Because language is usually left-lateralized, left-sided injuries often produce speech and language problems, while right-sided injuries more often produce spatial and attention deficits.

The brain also shows plasticity, the ability to reorganize. Recovery after stroke or injury often involves other regions taking on functions, especially in younger people and with intensive rehabilitation. Therapies such as speech-language therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy for arm weakness can help, though outcomes vary widely and are best planned with a rehabilitation team.

Not every lobe-related symptom signals structural damage. Fatigue, stress, sleep loss, medication effects, and mental health conditions can mimic cognitive problems. A doctor can sort these out with a history, examination, and sometimes imaging such as MRI or CT.

It’s worth remembering how recent this knowledge is. Early localization theories were criticized for being too rigid, and later views swung toward emphasizing networks. The modern consensus sits in between: functions are distributed but not uniformly, and some regions are more critical than others.

That means a symptom is a clue, not a verdict, and diagnosis belongs with a clinician.

Which myths about the brain’s lobes should you drop?

Several popular ideas fall apart under inspection. Here are four worth retiring.

1. “We only use 10 percent of our brains.” False. Brain imaging shows activity across the whole brain over the course of a day, and damage to nearly any region has noticeable consequences. Different areas are busier at different times, but none sits idle.
2. “You’re either left-brained or right-brained.” Largely a myth. Certain functions are lateralized, such as language in the left hemisphere for most people, but studies of brain activity find no evidence that people are dominated by one side. Creativity and logic both use both hemispheres and communicate through the corpus callosum.
3. “Each lobe has one job.” Overly simple. Lobes have signature roles, but most functions depend on networks spanning several lobes, and a single lobe participates in many tasks.
4. “Damage to one part is always permanent.” Not necessarily. Recovery depends on age, cause, size, and rehabilitation, and the brain can reorganize, sometimes substantially, though not always fully.

A related myth is that Phineas Gage proved the frontal lobes are the seat of personality. His case showed that injury to the brain could change behavior, which was a big deal in 1848, but later evidence suggests the changes were less extreme and more temporary than the legend claims. Personality, like most complex traits, involves distributed networks.

And one more: the assumption that brain scans can read minds or label people as “frontal” or “temporal” types. Functional imaging shows average patterns across groups, and individual differences are large. A scan can show that the visual cortex is active when you look at a picture; it can’t tell your boss why you’re late.

The brain is more interesting than the myths. It’s a vast, interconnected, partly flexible organ, not a set of rooms with fixed occupants.

How can you protect your brain, and when should you see a doctor?

Lifestyle habits that protect blood vessels and prevent injury also protect the lobes. There’s no magic supplement, but there are well-supported basics: staying physically active, managing blood pressure, not smoking, limiting alcohol, sleeping enough, staying socially and mentally engaged, and wearing helmets and seat belts.

Stroke is one of the biggest threats to the lobes, and speed matters. The FAST signs help recognize it: Face drooping, Arm weakness, Speech difficulty, Time to call emergency services. Other warning signs include sudden vision changes, loss of balance, severe headache, and confusion. Don’t wait for symptoms to pass; treatment works best when started quickly, and symptoms that resolve can still signal a transient ischemic attack.

Seek urgent medical care for:

• Sudden weakness or numbness on one side of the face or body.
• Sudden trouble speaking or understanding speech.
• Sudden loss of vision in one or both eyes, or double vision.
• Severe, abrupt headache unlike any before.
• Head injury followed by confusion, repeated vomiting, drowsiness, or seizures.
• New seizures, especially in someone without a history of epilepsy.

In an emergency, call 911 in the US or Canada, 999 in the UK, 112 or 999 in Ireland, 000 in Australia, or 111 in New Zealand.

For slower changes, see a primary care doctor (GP in the UK, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand): progressive memory trouble, personality or judgment changes, new difficulties with language, getting lost in familiar places, or vision problems that creep up. A doctor can check for treatable causes such as thyroid problems, vitamin deficiencies, medication effects, sleep apnea, depression, or infection, and refer to a neurologist when appropriate.

After a brain injury or stroke, rehabilitation can make a major difference. Speech-language pathologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and neuropsychologists each address different aspects of recovery, and psychological support matters too, since depression and anxiety are common after neurological injury. If you or someone close to you is struggling emotionally, reach out: in the US, call or text 988; in Canada, 9-8-8; in the UK or Ireland, Samaritans at 116 123 (Ireland also has Pieta at 1800 247 247); in Australia, Lifeline at 13 11 14; in New Zealand, 1737.

Your brain has five lobes and about a lifetime of work to do. Treat it accordingly.

FAQs about the 5 Lobes of the Brain

What are the 5 lobes of the brain and what do they do?

The five lobes are the frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and insular lobes. The frontal lobe handles planning, voluntary movement, speech production, and impulse control. The parietal lobe processes touch, body position, and spatial awareness. The temporal lobe is involved in hearing, language comprehension, memory, and recognizing faces and objects. The occipital lobe handles vision. The insula, hidden deep inside the lateral sulcus, helps with body awareness, taste, pain, and emotional feeling. Some sources count four lobes, leaving out the insula, or treat the limbic lobe as the fifth. All the lobes work together in networks.

Why do some sources say four lobes and others say five?

Because the insula is hidden and classification differs. The traditional teaching lists four visible lobes: frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital. The insula lies inside the lateral sulcus and is covered by parts of the other lobes, so many textbooks treat it as part of them or leave it out. Others count it as a fifth lobe, sometimes called the central lobe or island of Reil. Still others include the limbic lobe instead. The difference is mostly about how anatomists draw boundaries, not about disagreement on what the tissue does.

Which lobe controls personality?

No single lobe does. The frontal lobes, especially the prefrontal cortex, are strongly linked to judgment, impulse control, and social behavior, and injuries there can change personality. The case of Phineas Gage is the famous example, though later historians say the popular account exaggerates how severe and lasting his changes were. Personality also involves the temporal lobes, insula, and emotional circuits such as the amygdala, plus experience and genetics. It’s best understood as emerging from networks across the brain, not from one control center.

What happens if the temporal lobe is damaged?

It depends on the side and the extent. Damage can affect hearing, language comprehension, and the formation of new memories. The case of H.M., who lost both medial temporal lobes in 1953, showed that these structures are essential for forming new memories while leaving old ones and many skills intact. Damage can also cause difficulty recognizing faces, changes in emotional behavior, and seizures that may include déjà vu, odd smells, or sudden fear. Klüver and Bucy’s work on monkeys showed striking behavioral changes after bilateral temporal removal, and similar patterns, though rare, appear in people.

Is the left brain really logical and the right brain creative?

Not in the way popular culture suggests. Some functions are lateralized, notably language, which is left-dominant in roughly 90 to 95 percent of people, and certain spatial and attentional functions are more right-weighted. But brain imaging studies find no sign that people are mostly “left-brained” or “right-brained,” and creative and logical tasks engage both hemispheres, which communicate constantly through the corpus callosum. The idea is a persistent myth that has outlived the science, though it’s good for generating personality quizzes.

What does the insula do?

It senses and integrates signals from inside the body, a function called interoception, and plays a role in taste, pain, disgust, and the felt quality of emotion. Neuroanatomist A. D. Craig argued that the anterior insula re-represents body signals as the basis of subjective feelings. It’s also a core part of the salience network, which helps decide what deserves attention. Altered insula activity has been associated with anxiety, depression, addiction, and chronic pain in group studies, though these findings aren’t diagnostic for individuals and research is still developing.

Can the brain recover after damage to a lobe?

Often partly, sometimes substantially, but not always fully. The brain shows plasticity, meaning other regions can take over some functions, especially with intensive rehabilitation and in younger people. Recovery depends on the cause, size, and location of the damage, the person’s age and health, and how soon treatment starts. Speech therapy, physical and occupational therapy, and approaches like constraint-induced movement therapy can all help, though results vary. Early medical care for stroke or head injury matters a great deal, so don’t wait if you notice sudden changes.

When should I worry about symptoms that might involve a lobe of the brain?

Seek emergency help right away for sudden weakness or numbness on one side, sudden trouble speaking or understanding, sudden vision loss, a severe abrupt headache, new seizures, or confusion after a head injury. The FAST signs help identify stroke. For gradual changes, such as worsening memory, personality shifts, language difficulties, or vision problems that creep up, see a primary care doctor, who can check for treatable causes and refer you to a neurologist. Don’t wait for symptoms to resolve on their own, since early evaluation can change outcomes.

Bibliography

• Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(8), 655-666.
• Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., & Damasio, A. R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264(5162), 1102-1105.
• Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20-25.
• Harlow, J. M. (1868). Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head. Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society, 2, 327-347.
• Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160(1), 106-154.
• Klüver, H., & Bucy, P. C. (1939). Preliminary analysis of functions of the temporal lobes in monkeys. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 42(6), 979-1000.
• Macmillan, M. (2000). An odd kind of fame: Stories of Phineas Gage. MIT Press.
• Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 60(4), 389-443.
• Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 20(1), 11-21.
• Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). MIT Press.