Why a Man Avoids a Woman He Likes

Few relational experiences are quite as disorienting as this one: you sense that a man is genuinely interested in you — the way he looks at you, the energy when you talk, the small moments that feel like more than coincidence — and then, without explanation, he begins pulling away. He becomes harder to reach. Conversations that flowed easily start to feel strained. He seems to be deliberately creating distance between you, and you are left wondering what changed, what you did wrong, or whether you misread the entire situation from the start.

The experience is disorienting precisely because it violates what seems logical. If someone likes you, they should move toward you. Avoidance, from the outside, looks like disinterest. But the two are not the same thing — and understanding why a man avoids a woman he likes requires looking at what is actually happening beneath the surface of his behavior, at the psychological mechanisms that produce retreat in the presence of genuine attraction.

The short answer is that male avoidance in the context of attraction is almost never about the woman. It is about fear — fear of rejection, of vulnerability, of inadequacy, of repeating past pain, of losing control of an emotional experience that already feels larger than he knows how to manage. These fears are not unique to men, but the way they tend to manifest in male behavior — as distance, silence, and apparent indifference rather than expressed anxiety — makes them particularly difficult to interpret from the outside.

This article examines the most significant psychological reasons why men pull away from women they are genuinely drawn to, what attachment theory and emotional psychology reveal about this pattern, the behavioral signs that help distinguish attraction-driven avoidance from actual disinterest, and — perhaps most importantly — how to respond to this behavior in ways that serve your own wellbeing rather than inadvertently making the situation harder.

Understanding this dynamic does not mean excusing poor communication or tolerating hot-and-cold behavior indefinitely. It means having access to a more complete picture — one that allows you to make genuinely informed decisions about how to proceed, rather than operating from a story constructed entirely from uncertainty and hurt.

The Core Psychology of Male Avoidance: Why Attraction and Distance Coexist

When a man avoids a woman he genuinely likes, the behavior is almost always driven by emotional self-protection — the nervous system retreating from a situation it has identified as risky before the conscious mind has fully registered why. This might seem counterintuitive, but it reflects something fundamental about how the brain processes the experience of being strongly drawn to someone.

Genuine attraction — not casual interest but real, significant feeling — is inherently vulnerable. It creates a form of dependence on another person’s response that most people find deeply uncomfortable, particularly those who have learned through prior experience that emotional dependence leads to pain. The more a man likes a woman, the more her response to him matters. And the more her response matters, the more risk he carries simply by being in her presence.

The psychological concept of approach-avoidance conflict, described by psychologist Kurt Lewin, captures this dynamic precisely. When the same object or person generates both approach motivation (attraction, desire for connection) and avoidance motivation (fear of rejection, fear of being hurt, fear of inadequacy), the two drives create a state of tension that can produce erratic behavior — moving closer, then pulling back, then circling again from a distance. From the outside, this looks like mixed signals. From the inside, it is the experience of wanting something very much while simultaneously being afraid of it.

What makes this pattern particularly pronounced in men is a combination of biological temperament and cultural conditioning. Many men are socialized from childhood to suppress emotional vulnerability, to project confidence rather than uncertainty, and to interpret the experience of strong feeling as a kind of weakness requiring management. The result is that emotional intensity — particularly the intensity of significant attraction — can feel threatening rather than simply exciting. Distance becomes a way of managing that threat without having to acknowledge or articulate it.

A useful practical reframe: when you observe this kind of avoidant behavior from a man you know is interested, resist the instinct to interpret it as a statement about your worth or desirability. It is much more likely a statement about his current capacity to handle the emotional weight of what he is feeling.

Fear of Rejection: The Most Common Driver of Attraction-Based Avoidance

Fear of rejection is, across virtually every psychological framework for understanding human behavior, the most commonly cited reason why men avoid women they are genuinely attracted to. It operates at a level that often precedes conscious deliberation — an automatic risk-assessment process that interprets significant attraction as significant exposure, and significant exposure as significant danger.

The logic, once articulated, is straightforward: if you approach someone you like and they reject you, you lose both the possibility of the relationship and a portion of your self-image. The more you like them, the higher the potential loss. For someone whose self-worth is already fragile — who has been rejected before in ways that felt definitively damaging — the calculation quickly produces avoidance as the safest available option. You cannot be rejected for an advance you never made.

This fear is often masked by behavior that appears to have nothing to do with emotion. A man afraid of rejection from a woman he likes might suddenly become busier, more distracted, less communicative, or inexplicably cold — none of which looks like fear from the outside, but all of which functions as distance from a situation he has identified as threatening. He may even begin focusing attention on women he is less attracted to, precisely because the lower stakes make approach feel less dangerous.

What matters to understand is that fear of rejection is not a sign of weakness — it is a universal human experience. The nervous system is doing exactly what it was designed to do: protecting against the possibility of pain. The problem is not the fear itself but the avoidance behavior it generates, which prevents the very connection both people might want and which, left unaddressed, tends to become self-fulfilling. The woman, receiving consistent mixed signals, eventually withdraws or loses interest — confirming the fear that approach was not going to work.

Avoidant Attachment Style: When the Pattern Runs Deeper Than One Situation

For some men, avoidance in the context of attraction is not a situational response to specific circumstances but a persistent relational pattern rooted in early attachment experiences. Attachment theory — developed by John Bowlby and later extended by Mary Ainsworth — describes how the care we receive in early childhood shapes the templates we carry into adult relationships, including our characteristic ways of handling closeness and vulnerability.

People who develop an avoidant attachment style have typically learned, through early experiences of inconsistent or emotionally unavailable caregiving, that closeness is unreliable and that emotional dependence on others leads to disappointment. As adults, they tend to value independence highly, become uncomfortable when relationships begin to feel emotionally intense, and pull back — sometimes sharply — at exactly the moments when greater closeness might be expected. This withdrawal is not deliberate cruelty. It is the nervous system executing a deeply conditioned protective strategy.

The avoidant pattern shows up with particular force when attraction is strongest. A man with avoidant attachment may be genuinely drawn to a woman and still find himself creating distance as the relationship develops — not because he has lost interest but because the increasing emotional significance of the connection is activating his core anxiety about dependence and vulnerability. The closer she gets, the more his system pushes for space.

Understanding this pattern is not about excusing ongoing avoidance or tolerating behavior that causes consistent distress. It is about recognizing that what looks like withdrawal is often a reflection of internal conflict rather than external judgment. Earned security in relationships is possible for people with avoidant attachment — but it typically requires both self-awareness and, in many cases, the support of a skilled therapist who works with attachment patterns.

Past Emotional Wounds and the Fear of Being Hurt Again

A man who has been significantly hurt in a previous relationship — through betrayal, abandonment, or the kind of loss that restructures your sense of safety in love — carries that experience forward into new attractions whether he intends to or not. This is not sentimentality or inability to move on in any simple sense. It is the nervous system’s memory, which is considerably more durable than conscious intention.

When past relational pain has been significant — a partner who cheated, a relationship that ended without explanation, an attachment that was established and then severed in ways that felt catastrophic — the brain learns to treat similar emotional contexts as potential danger zones. A new woman who produces strong feelings activates not just attraction but also the memory of how the last time he felt this way ended. The approach-avoidance tension intensifies accordingly.

This pattern is sometimes described in clinical contexts as a trauma-informed response to intimacy — a protective mechanism that makes perfect evolutionary sense but that creates genuine suffering in the present. The man is not avoiding this woman because of anything she has done. He is avoiding the emotional territory she has activated, because that territory is associated with previous pain that has not yet been fully processed or integrated.

The practical implication for the woman experiencing this from the outside: patience and consistent, low-pressure presence tend to be more effective than direct confrontation or attempts to accelerate the pace of closeness. A man responding to attachment wounds needs safety demonstrated through consistent behavior over time, not accelerated intimacy. His nervous system needs evidence that this situation is genuinely different from the one that hurt him — and that evidence can only accumulate gradually.

Emotional Unavailability: When Life Circumstances Block Genuine Connection

Genuine attraction and genuine readiness for a relationship are not the same thing, and a man can have one without the other. Emotional unavailability — the condition of being attracted to someone while simultaneously being unable to show up for the relational experience that attraction might lead to — is one of the most common and least discussed reasons why men pull back from women they genuinely like.

Emotional unavailability has multiple sources. It may follow significant loss — the death of someone close, a recent painful breakup, a major life disruption — that has absorbed the emotional resources that a new relationship would require. It may reflect a current life context — significant career pressure, family crisis, health challenges, or major transition — that makes the addition of relational complexity genuinely unsustainable. Or it may reflect more chronic internal factors: unprocessed grief, untreated depression or anxiety, or a pattern of emotional compartmentalization that prevents genuine presence in intimate contexts.

From the outside, emotional unavailability looks almost identical to disinterest. The man is present in some moments and absent in others. He gives signals of attraction without following through. He seems engaged and then retreats. What distinguishes it from simple disinterest is that the unavailability is typically consistent across situations rather than specific to the woman — if you could observe his other close relationships, you would see similar patterns of engagement and withdrawal operating there too.

The difficult truth about emotional unavailability is that it cannot be resolved by the other person. No amount of patience, reassurance, or effort on the woman’s part changes the internal conditions that are producing the unavailability. Only the man’s own work — through therapy, through intentional self-examination, through the deliberate choice to address whatever has created the unavailability — produces genuine change. Understanding this protects you from the exhausting and ultimately fruitless effort of trying to make someone ready for something they are not yet able to offer.

Low Self-Worth and the “Out of My League” Conviction

A man who does not feel fundamentally deserving of the woman he is attracted to will often manage that feeling through avoidance rather than approach — not because he lacks interest but because he cannot reconcile his desire with his self-image. This pattern — sometimes described colloquially as thinking she is “out of his league” — is fundamentally a self-worth issue wearing the costume of disinterest.

The internal experience is one of preemptive defeat: “She would never be interested in someone like me. Approaching her will only expose what I already know — that I am not enough. Better to admire from a distance, where the rejection cannot find me.” The avoidance protects the self-image from a confrontation it has already decided would go badly.

This pattern is particularly common among men who are genuinely drawn to qualities in a woman that they perceive themselves to lack — confidence, social ease, professional achievement, physical beauty by conventional standards, or any combination of attributes that their inner critic has framed as disqualifying. The attraction is real. The assessment of their own worth is distorted. And the resulting behavior — distance, apparent indifference, the deliberate suppression of visible interest — is a form of self-protection that the woman on the receiving end has no reliable way to interpret without more direct communication.

What can shift this pattern is not pursuit — which often intensifies the man’s conviction that something must be wrong if someone so desirable is interested — but rather consistent, genuine, low-pressure interaction that gradually provides evidence that contradicts the self-defeating story. Connection that is built through authentic shared experience, without the pressure of escalation, creates conditions in which low self-worth can slowly yield to something more accurate.

Not Being Ready for Something Serious: Timing and Internal Readiness

A man can have genuine feelings for a woman and still not be in a position to act on them — and this mismatch between feeling and readiness is one of the most frequently underestimated reasons for avoidance behavior. Internal readiness for a relationship involves more than the presence of attraction. It involves a sense of stability in other life domains, clarity about one’s own values and direction, and the emotional resources to invest in someone else’s experience as well as one’s own.

Some men carry an internal narrative about the life conditions they need to meet before they can justify pursuing a relationship: a certain level of professional establishment, financial stability, personal development, or resolution of ongoing life challenges. From the outside, these self-imposed conditions may seem arbitrary or unnecessarily rigid. From the inside, they are often deeply meaningful — connected to ideas about what it means to be worthy of commitment, to have something genuine to offer, or to avoid repeating patterns that failed in the past.

When a man who is not internally ready encounters a woman he is genuinely drawn to, the combination of attraction and unreadiness produces approach-avoidance tension in its purest form. He wants to be closer. He does not feel equipped to do so responsibly. The result is the characteristically confusing intermittent behavior — moments of visible connection followed by unexplained withdrawal — that is one of the most reliable signs that timing rather than feeling is the operative issue.

This is not a problem with a simple solution. Readiness cannot be manufactured by either person in a relationship — it develops through the individual’s own life work and self-development. What matters, from a self-protective standpoint, is not investing more than the situation is currently able to sustain, and being honest with yourself about whether waiting for someone to become ready is a reasonable allocation of your own time and emotional resources.

Signs That Help Distinguish Avoidance Driven by Attraction from Simple Disinterest

The behavioral difference between a man who is avoiding you because he is attracted to you and one who is avoiding you because he is not interested is genuinely difficult to read, but not impossible — if you know what to look for.

Signs that avoidance may be attraction-driven rather than disinterest:

• Inconsistency rather than consistent distance. Attraction-driven avoidance tends to produce hot-and-cold behavior — moments of visible warmth and engagement alternating with withdrawal. Pure disinterest tends to be consistently cool rather than intermittent.
• Physical awareness in your presence. Nervousness, tension, heightened attention to appearance, awareness of your movements even when not directly interacting with you — these are physiological signs of arousal that are difficult to fake and that tend to persist even when someone is trying to suppress visible interest.
• Noticing and remembering details. When a man who appears to be avoiding you consistently remembers things you mentioned casually, notices changes in your appearance, or demonstrates a detailed awareness of your circumstances, that attention reflects genuine investment that pure disinterest does not produce.
• Finding reasons to be near you without initiating direct contact. Positioning himself in your environment without approaching is one of the most characteristic features of attraction-driven avoidance — he wants proximity while managing the anxiety that direct engagement produces.
• Awkwardness specifically with you rather than in general. If a man who is comfortable and socially fluent in most contexts becomes visibly awkward, tongue-tied, or self-conscious specifically in your presence, the specificity is informative. Disinterest does not typically produce that kind of targeted social disruption.

None of these signs is definitive on its own. But a consistent cluster of them, read against the context of the relationship and the man’s general behavioral patterns, provides considerably more information than any single signal in isolation.

What to Do When a Man You Like Is Avoiding You

The most important thing to understand when navigating this situation is that how you respond matters both for your own wellbeing and, to the extent that you want connection with this person, for the dynamics between you. The instinctive responses to being avoided — pursuing harder, withdrawing dramatically to test his reaction, or suppressing your own needs indefinitely — tend to produce worse outcomes than more deliberate approaches.

1. Regulate your own emotional response first. The anxiety that avoidance produces tends to generate urgency — the impulse to resolve the uncertainty through rapid action. Acting from that urgency rarely serves you well. Taking time to identify and name what you are actually feeling, rather than immediately acting on it, restores the perspective that anxious urgency removes.
2. Create low-pressure opportunities for connection rather than escalating intensity. If this person is avoiding you because the emotional stakes feel too high, increasing those stakes through pursuit typically intensifies the avoidance. Low-pressure, enjoyable interaction that does not carry explicit relational weight can be significantly more effective at reducing the distance than any more direct approach.
3. Ask a direct, non-accusatory question when the moment is right. Not “why are you avoiding me?” — which invites defensiveness — but something simpler and more genuinely curious: “I feel like there’s been some distance between us lately. Is everything okay?” This opens a door without pushing anyone through it.
4. Hold your own needs and boundaries clearly. Understanding why someone is pulling back does not obligate you to wait indefinitely or to make yourself smaller to accommodate their difficulty. You have needs too. Those needs deserve to be named and respected, both by you and by anyone you are in relationship with.
5. Assess the pattern honestly over time rather than explaining it away. Occasional avoidance is a normal feature of how many people navigate early or developing attraction. Consistent, persistent avoidance that never resolves into genuine availability — regardless of how clear the signals of interest may be — is a pattern worth taking seriously on its own terms rather than perpetually attributing to explainable temporary causes.
6. Invest in your own life fully, regardless of outcome. This is not a strategy for getting his attention. It is the only genuinely self-respecting position available when dealing with someone whose availability is unclear. A full, engaged life — one that is not organized around another person’s emotional readiness — is both psychologically protective and, practically, the context in which the best relationships tend to develop.

The Role of Cultural Scripts: How Socialized Masculinity Shapes Avoidant Behavior

A complete account of why men avoid women they like has to reckon honestly with the role of cultural conditioning — the socialized scripts about masculinity, emotional expression, and vulnerability that shape how many men relate to their own feelings and to the people those feelings are directed toward.

In many cultural contexts, men receive explicit and implicit messages from childhood onward that emotional vulnerability is incompatible with strength, that expressing uncertainty or need makes them less attractive or less masculine, and that showing how much they care about someone — before that care is confirmed to be reciprocated — is a form of weakness that others will exploit or judge. These messages do not disappear in adulthood. They become part of the internal narrative that governs how emotional experience gets interpreted and expressed.

The result is that many men experience genuine, deep attraction and simultaneously interpret that feeling as something requiring management rather than expression. The emotional suppression that has been practiced since childhood does not shut off when it would actually be appropriate to feel and express vulnerability. Instead, it produces the familiar combination of visible attraction and behavioral withdrawal that women on the receiving end find so confusing.

This is a cultural problem as much as it is an individual one. The expectation that men should be emotionally self-sufficient, confident to the point of imperviousness, and consistently the initiator in heterosexual romantic dynamics creates conditions in which honest emotional expression becomes uniquely costly for men in ways that it is not for women. Compassion for this cultural reality — not as an excuse for ongoing poor communication but as context for understanding the origin of the pattern — makes navigation considerably more effective than pure frustration.

When Avoidance Signals Something Worth Taking Seriously

Not all avoidance is the product of internal conflict about genuine attraction. There are circumstances in which consistent avoidance reflects something that deserves a different response than patient understanding and strategic low-pressure engagement.

Avoidance that is worth taking more seriously on its own terms — rather than interpreting charitably as attraction-driven hesitance — includes:

• Avoidance that persists without any change despite time and consistent positive interaction. Fear-driven avoidance typically shows some movement when the conditions that produced it gradually shift. If months pass and the pattern remains entirely static, the explanation is less likely to be fear and more likely to be genuine disinterest or chronic emotional unavailability.
• Avoidance accompanied by inconsistency that has a manipulative quality. The specific pattern of appearing when you are moving on and disappearing when you are most invested is not fear — it is intermittent reinforcement, which is one of the most reliably damaging relational dynamics available. If the attention only arrives when you are withdrawing, the relationship is organized around your insecurity rather than any genuine mutual investment.
• Avoidance in a context where there are clear obligations to communicate directly — such as a workplace relationship, an established friendship, or a situation where your practical life is affected by his unavailability. In these contexts, the courtesy of clear communication is a basic relational responsibility regardless of emotional complexity.
• Avoidance that is producing ongoing distress that is affecting your daily functioning, sleep, self-worth, or other relationships. When someone’s approach-avoidance behavior is significantly disrupting your psychological wellbeing, that impact is itself important information — not about what his behavior means but about how invested you have become in an outcome over which you have very limited control.

FAQs About Why Men Avoid Women They Like

Why would a guy who clearly likes me suddenly start avoiding me?

Several psychological mechanisms can produce sudden avoidance after clear interest. The most common is that the relationship has reached a level of emotional significance that is triggering his fear response — the point where the stakes feel high enough that the risk of rejection or vulnerability has become difficult to tolerate. This is sometimes called the point of emotional overwhelm in the approach-avoidance dynamic: the closer things get to being real, the louder the anxiety becomes. Other common triggers include a specific interaction that felt too vulnerable or too exposing, an external life event that has consumed his emotional resources, or the activation of past relational pain by something that reminded him of a previous hurt. What matters to notice is whether the sudden avoidance is accompanied by any continuing signs of interest — attention from a distance, nervous energy in your presence — which would suggest temporary retreat rather than genuine disengagement.

Does a man avoid eye contact with someone he likes?

Yes — and this is one of the more reliable behavioral signs of attraction-driven avoidance precisely because it is difficult to fake or manufacture. A man who is attracted to someone and uncomfortable with that attraction often shows a distinctive eye contact pattern: intense but brief eye contact that is quickly broken, followed by deliberate looking away and then a return of the gaze. This is physically different from the steady, comfortable eye contact of someone who feels neutral about you, and it is different from the consistent avoidance of someone who is not interested. The brief, intense quality reflects genuine attention that is being managed — the nervous system drawn toward contact and simultaneously retreating from it. Context matters, however; some individuals naturally avoid eye contact due to social anxiety or neurodivergence, so this sign is most informative when read alongside other behavioral cues.

How do you know if a man is avoiding you because he likes you or because he is not interested?

The distinction lies primarily in the consistency and quality of the avoidance rather than its presence or absence. Attraction-driven avoidance tends to be intermittent — marked by moments of warmth and engagement mixed with withdrawal — while disinterest tends to produce consistently neutral or cool behavior without the hot-and-cold cycling. Physical signs are particularly informative: nervousness specifically in your presence, heightened attentiveness to your movements, the tendency to position himself near you without initiating direct contact, and the retention of specific details you mentioned casually all reflect genuine investment that disinterest does not produce. Awkwardness with you specifically, in someone who is otherwise socially comfortable, is another reliable signal. The most direct way to resolve uncertainty when the pattern is genuinely ambiguous is a low-pressure, non-accusatory direct conversation — which carries its own risks but produces considerably more reliable information than behavioral interpretation alone.

What does avoidant attachment look like when a man likes someone?

Avoidant attachment in the context of genuine attraction produces a characteristic pattern: initial engagement and warmth as the relationship develops, followed by increasing distance precisely as things become more emotionally significant. A man with avoidant attachment may be genuinely interested and even caring, but find himself pulling back every time the relationship reaches a new level of closeness — creating an intermittent dynamic that can feel to the other person like being repeatedly invited in and then pushed away. He may have difficulty talking about feelings, downplay the importance of the relationship even when his behavior contradicts that framing, become particularly elusive when vulnerability or commitment is implicitly on the table, and value independence in ways that can feel like emotional unavailability. This pattern is not deliberately hurtful, but it does require significant self-awareness and often professional support to change meaningfully.

Should I pursue a man who seems to be avoiding me, or give him space?

The answer depends on what you mean by pursuing and what the specifics of the situation are. If pursuing means escalating intensity, sending frequent messages when he is not responding, or doing more to compensate for his inconsistency — this typically makes things worse rather than better for both people. Avoidance driven by anxiety about emotional stakes tends to intensify when the stakes increase further. What tends to work better is creating low-pressure, genuinely enjoyable connection that does not carry explicit relational weight — interaction that demonstrates your interest while simultaneously demonstrating that you are not dependent on his availability in ways that would intensify his anxiety. Giving genuine space — not as a tactic but as an authentic reflection of your own full life that does not orbit his readiness — tends to produce better conditions for real connection than either persistent pursuit or dramatic withdrawal.

Can a man overcome his fear of approaching a woman he likes?

Yes — and in most cases, the path through fear of approach involves both individual psychological work and gradual, low-pressure exposure to the feared relational experience. From a cognitive behavioral perspective, avoidance maintains and amplifies fear by preventing the corrective experiences that would disconfirm the feared outcome. Each time a man avoids approaching someone he likes, the fear is reinforced rather than reduced. The movement through fear requires a combination of challenging the catastrophic thinking that drives avoidance — “If I approach her and she is not interested, that will be unbearable” — and taking small, manageable steps toward the feared situation rather than waiting for the fear to disappear before acting. Therapy, particularly approaches that address attachment patterns and interpersonal anxiety, can be enormously useful in supporting this process for men whose avoidance is rooted in deeper relational patterns rather than simply situational nervousness.

What does it mean for my own wellbeing if I keep getting involved with men who avoid intimacy?

If you notice a recurring pattern in which you are consistently drawn to men who are emotionally unavailable, avoidant, or unable to offer consistent presence and closeness, this pattern is worth examining honestly and compassionately. Attachment theory suggests that we tend to recreate familiar relational dynamics rather than simply choosing poorly — that there is something psychologically organizing about the kind of connection that matches our early relational templates, even when those templates are uncomfortable. If anxious-avoidant dynamics feel familiar, it may be because inconsistent availability and the pursuit of connection that cannot fully be obtained is a relational experience you learned early. Working with a therapist who specializes in attachment can help illuminate the pattern and support the development of a different relational template — one that makes consistently available, genuinely present partners feel as compelling and attractive as the unavailable ones.

Bibliography

• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
• Levine, A., & Heller, R. (2010). Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find — and Keep — Love. TarcherPerigee.
• Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality. McGraw-Hill.
• Johnson, S. M. (2008). Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. Little, Brown Spark.
• Brown, B. (2010). The Gifts of Imperfection. Hazelden Publishing.
• Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony Books.
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. Guilford Press.
• Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory. W. W. Norton.
• Pollack, W. (1998). Real Boys: Rescuing Our Sons from the Myths of Boyhood. Random House.
• Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Viking.