The 8 Dimensions of the Human Being (And What They Consist Of)

What does it mean to be truly well? Not just free of illness, not just functioning — but genuinely, deeply well in the fullest sense of what it means to be human? That question has occupied philosophers, physicians, and psychologists for centuries, and the answer they keep arriving at is the same: human wellbeing cannot be reduced to any single dimension. We are not simply bodies, or minds, or social creatures, or spiritual seekers — we are all of these simultaneously, and the quality of our lives depends on how well we attend to each layer of our existence.

The 8 dimensions of the human being — physical, emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual, occupational, environmental, and financial — offer one of the most comprehensive and evidence-grounded frameworks for understanding what a whole and flourishing human life actually requires. This model, developed and refined within holistic health and positive psychology traditions, reframes wellbeing not as the absence of problems but as the active cultivation of multiple interconnected domains of human experience.

The framework draws from rich traditions in psychology and philosophy. Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs — which identified physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization needs as the architecture of human motivation — pointed toward the multidimensional nature of human flourishing decades before the term “holistic health” entered mainstream usage. Martin Seligman’s PERMA model of wellbeing similarly identified Positive Emotions, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment as distinct but interrelated components of flourishing. The eight-dimension model extends these frameworks further, providing a map that is both comprehensive enough to honor the complexity of human experience and practical enough to guide real behavioral change.

This guide explores each of the eight dimensions in depth — examining what each means, why it matters, how the dimensions interact, and what you can do, concretely and immediately, to strengthen each one.

The Physical Dimension — Your Body as the Foundation of All Wellbeing

The physical dimension encompasses everything related to the body: movement, nutrition, sleep, illness prevention, physical health management, and the relationship between bodily states and psychological functioning. It is the most immediately tangible of the eight dimensions — and often the one that most visibly affects all the others when it is neglected.

The relationship between physical health and psychological wellbeing is not metaphorical — it is neurobiological. The gut-brain axis, a bidirectional communication network between the enteric nervous system and the central nervous system, means that intestinal health directly influences mood, cognition, and stress response. Chronic sleep deprivation impairs prefrontal cortical function — reducing emotional regulation capacity, decision-making quality, and resistance to cognitive distortions in ways that mirror the effects of several psychological disorders. Physical exercise has been demonstrated across decades of research to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety through multiple mechanisms: releasing endorphins, increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), regulating cortisol, and providing mastery experiences that build self-efficacy — Albert Bandura’s term for the belief in one’s capacity to execute the behaviors required to achieve specific outcomes.

The physical dimension also encompasses the relationship people have with their own bodies — not just what bodies can do, but how people feel about, inhabit, and treat them. Body image, somatic awareness, chronic pain management, and the psychological experience of illness all belong here. Bessel van der Kolk’s foundational insight — that trauma is stored in the body’s nervous system, not only in conscious memory — has expanded how clinicians understand the physical dimension of psychological experience, and how body-oriented practices including yoga, somatic experiencing, and sensorimotor psychotherapy can support healing that talk therapy alone does not always reach.

Practical starting point: Choose one physical habit to examine this week — sleep, movement, or nutrition. Not to overhaul it, but simply to observe it honestly. What does your body actually need that you have been postponing?

The Emotional Dimension — Feeling Fully Without Being Controlled by Feelings

The emotional dimension of human wellbeing encompasses the capacity to recognize, understand, express, and regulate emotions — both one’s own and those of others. It is not about being happy all the time, or eliminating difficult feelings. It is about developing a relationship with the full range of human emotional experience that is neither avoidant nor overwhelming.

Emotional intelligence — popularized by Daniel Goleman drawing on the foundational research of Peter Salovey and John Mayer — describes the capacity to perceive emotions accurately, to use emotional information to facilitate thought, to understand the complex dynamics of emotional experience, and to manage emotions effectively in both self and others. This is not a fixed trait. It is a set of skills that can be developed, and that postgraduate psychology training, therapeutic work, and deliberate reflective practice all build over time.

Lisa Feldman Barrett’s theory of constructed emotion offers a particularly useful reframe: emotions are not universal biological programs that happen to us, but predictions constructed by the brain based on past experience, bodily signals, and cultural context. This means that the emotional dimension of human wellbeing is more malleable than many people assume — our emotional responses are shaped by learning, context, and the stories we tell ourselves about what our bodily sensations mean.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), developed by Marsha Linehan, has contributed some of the most practically useful tools for emotional dimension work: radical acceptance (acknowledging reality as it is, without approving of it), opposite action (deliberately acting contrary to the action urge associated with a painful emotion), and emotional validation (recognizing that feelings make sense given their context, even when they are not helpful in guiding behavior). These are not exclusively clinical tools — they are skills that anyone can learn.

The emotional dimension also includes the capacity for grief. Full emotional health is not the absence of pain — it is the capacity to feel pain without being permanently disabled by it. Psychologist Susan David’s concept of emotional agility — the ability to approach emotions with curiosity and compassion rather than avoidance or rigid control — captures what mature emotional wellbeing actually looks like in practice.

Practical starting point: When a difficult emotion arises today, try naming it specifically — not just “bad” but anxious, ashamed, disappointed, or lonely. Research by psychologist Matthew Lieberman suggests that labeling emotions reduces their intensity by engaging prefrontal regulatory circuits — a process sometimes called “name it to tame it.”

The Intellectual Dimension — Curiosity, Growth, and the Nourishment of the Mind

The intellectual dimension encompasses the active engagement of the mind — through learning, critical thinking, creativity, problem-solving, and the ongoing cultivation of curiosity. It reflects the human need not just to know things, but to keep growing intellectually across the lifespan.

Carol Dweck’s growth mindset research is central here: the belief that intelligence and ability are developable through effort and effective strategy — rather than fixed at birth — predicts continued intellectual engagement, resilience in the face of difficulty, and openness to challenge. People with growth mindsets tend to view intellectual difficulty not as evidence of inadequacy but as the necessary friction of learning — the feeling that something is hard is evidence that the brain is forming new connections, not that one has reached one’s limits.

The intellectual dimension is not confined to formal education. It encompasses the quality of one’s intellectual diet: the books read, the questions pursued, the ideas engaged with and challenged. It includes metacognition — thinking about how one thinks — which Flavell’s foundational research identified as a critical component of effective learning and self-regulation. It includes creative activity — drawing, writing, music, design — which engages cognitive processes of divergent thinking and generative problem-solving that purely analytical activity does not reach.

Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of flow is particularly relevant to the intellectual dimension. Flow states — characterized by complete absorption in a challenging activity that matches one’s skill level — are among the most reliably reported positive experiences across cultures and age groups. They tend to occur at the intersection of genuine challenge and genuine competence, and intellectual activities — complex reading, creative writing, learning a new instrument, engaging with an intellectually demanding problem — are among the most common flow-inducing pursuits.

The intellectual dimension also has protective effects on cognitive aging. Continued intellectual engagement throughout adulthood has been associated with greater cognitive reserve — a buffer against the neurological changes of aging that allows higher cognitive functioning to be maintained for longer.

Practical starting point: Identify one subject you have always been curious about but never formally explored. Commit twenty minutes this week to following that curiosity — a book chapter, a documentary, a long article. Notice what it feels like to engage with a subject purely because it interests you.

The Social Dimension — Connection as a Biological Need, Not a Preference

The social dimension encompasses the quality of one’s relationships — with family, friends, colleagues, romantic partners, community members, and the broader social fabric. It is not about being extroverted, or having many relationships. It is about the depth, quality, and felt sense of belonging and connection within the relationships one does have.

John Cacioppo’s decades of research on loneliness demonstrated something that surprised many people when it was first published: loneliness is not merely a psychological discomfort. It is a physiological state with measurable effects on inflammation, immune function, cardiovascular health, sleep architecture, and cognitive function. Chronically lonely individuals show elevated cortisol, disrupted sleep, increased inflammatory markers, and faster cognitive decline in older age. Social connection, in Cacioppo’s framework, is a biological need — as fundamental to human survival as food or shelter — because human beings evolved as obligatorily social animals whose survival depended on group membership.

Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby and extended by Mary Ainsworth’s empirical work on attachment patterns, provides the developmental framework for understanding why early relational experiences shape the capacity for adult social connection. Secure attachment — formed through consistent, sensitive caregiving in early childhood — predicts greater ease in forming and maintaining close relationships in adulthood, greater comfort with emotional intimacy, and greater resilience under stress. But attachment patterns are not deterministic: the concept of earned security describes how people with insecure attachment histories can develop more secure relational functioning through meaningful relationships, therapeutic work, and deliberate relational learning in adulthood.

The social dimension also encompasses the capacity for repair — the ability to recognize ruptures in important relationships and take steps to restore connection. The research of John Gottman on couple relationships identified not the absence of conflict but the quality of repair as the distinguishing feature of durable, satisfying partnerships.

Practical starting point: Identify one relationship that matters to you that you have been neglecting — not through ill will, but through the accumulated busyness of life. Reach out today with genuine attention, not obligation. Reciprocity and presence are the most effective relational investments available.

The Spiritual Dimension — Meaning, Purpose, and Connection to Something Larger

The spiritual dimension is perhaps the most misunderstood of the eight. It does not require religious belief, institutional affiliation, or any particular metaphysical commitment. It refers to the human need for meaning, purpose, transcendence, and a sense of connection to something larger than the individual self — whether that is expressed through religious faith, philosophical commitment, engagement with nature, artistic experience, humanitarian service, or the deep practice of mindfulness and contemplation.

Viktor Frankl — whose existential psychology emerged from his experience of survival in Nazi concentration camps — argued in his landmark work that the search for meaning is the primary motivational force in human life. His logotherapy positioned the capacity to find meaning even in suffering as the deepest resource of human psychological resilience. Frankl observed that individuals who maintained a sense of purpose — a reason to survive, a commitment to another person, a project to complete — showed greater psychological endurance under conditions of extreme deprivation than those who had lost their sense of meaning.

Contemporary positive psychology has operationalized the spiritual dimension through Martin Seligman’s PERMA model — specifically through the M for Meaning — and through research on purpose in life as a distinct wellbeing construct. Purpose is associated not only with psychological flourishing but with reduced mortality risk, greater resistance to cognitive decline, and higher levels of prosocial behavior.

The spiritual dimension also encompasses the experience of awe — the emotion evoked by encountering vastness or beauty that exceeds current frameworks of understanding. Psychologist Dacher Keltner’s research on awe suggests that it reliably produces a sense of the “small self” — a temporary reduction in self-focused rumination — alongside increases in curiosity, prosocial motivation, and connection to others. Awe is accessible not only in grand religious or natural experiences, but in music, art, moments of scientific revelation, and the perception of extraordinary human skill or courage.

Practical starting point: Spend five minutes this week doing one thing solely for its meaning to you — not its productivity, not its social performance. Journal, meditate, walk in nature, pray, or simply sit with a question about what matters most in your life right now. The spiritual dimension is cultivated through attention, not belief.

The Occupational Dimension — Work, Purpose, and the Psychology of Meaningful Activity

The occupational dimension encompasses the relationship between a person and their work — paid or unpaid, professional or voluntary — and the extent to which that work provides a sense of purpose, competence, contribution, and alignment with one’s values. It is not about career success in a conventional sense. It is about the psychological experience of one’s daily activities and their relationship to one’s sense of self and meaning.

The distinction between a job, a career, and a calling — popularized in positive psychology research by Amy Wrzesniewski — captures something important about the occupational dimension. People who experience their work primarily as a job focus on the financial rewards and view work as a means to an end. Those who experience it as a career focus on advancement and achievement. Those who experience it as a calling find intrinsic meaning in the work itself — it connects to their values and their sense of identity in ways that make it feel purposeful beyond compensation. Crucially, this is not purely a function of job type: people in identical roles can experience their work as job, career, or calling depending on how they relate to it.

The concept of job crafting — developed by Wrzesniewski and Jane Dutton — describes the proactive ways that individuals reshape their roles to align more closely with their strengths, values, and social needs. Task crafting involves changing the content of work. Relational crafting involves changing with whom one works and how. Cognitive crafting involves changing the way one perceives the purpose of one’s work. All three forms have been associated with greater job satisfaction, wellbeing, and engagement.

Self-Determination Theory, developed by Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, identifies autonomy, competence, and relatedness as the three universal psychological needs that work must support for intrinsic motivation to flourish. Workplaces that satisfy these needs — providing genuine autonomy over how tasks are performed, opportunities to develop and express competence, and meaningful connection with colleagues — produce employees who are more engaged, more creative, and more psychologically well.

Practical starting point: Consider one small act of job crafting you could implement this week. Is there a task you could approach differently, a relationship with a colleague you could deepen, or a frame for your work’s contribution that you have not been using? Small adjustments in how work is experienced accumulate into meaningful change over time.

The Environmental Dimension — How Physical Surroundings Shape Psychological States

The environmental dimension addresses the reciprocal relationship between human beings and their physical surroundings — both the immediate environments in which people live and work, and the broader natural and social environments that sustain or undermine wellbeing. This dimension has moved from the periphery to the center of psychological attention as research has accumulated on the profound effects of environmental conditions on mood, cognition, stress, and social behavior.

Environmental psychology — the systematic study of the relationship between physical environments and human behavior — has produced findings that consistently challenge the assumption that physical surroundings are merely the backdrop to psychological experience. Roger Ulrich’s foundational research demonstrated that hospital patients with views of nature recovered faster from surgery, required less pain medication, and reported greater wellbeing than patients whose windows faced a brick wall — a finding that has transformed hospital design philosophy. Rachel and Stephen Kaplan’s attention restoration theory proposes that natural environments restore directed attention capacity — the cognitive resource depleted by sustained concentration — in ways that urban environments do not, explaining why time in nature reliably reduces mental fatigue and improves mood.

The home environment matters profoundly. Clutter, noise, poor lighting, and spatial overcrowding are associated with elevated cortisol and reduced cognitive performance. Environmental psychologists have documented the phenomenon of decision fatigue — the deterioration of decision quality after sustained periods of choice-making — and demonstrated that organized, aesthetically coherent environments reduce the cognitive load associated with simply existing in a space, preserving more cognitive resources for meaningful activity.

The environmental dimension also encompasses what Urie Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory identifies as the broader social and cultural environment — the macrosystem of cultural values, social norms, institutional structures, and political conditions that shape the opportunities available to individuals. Environmental wellbeing is not only personal — it is political, in the sense that access to safe, clean, aesthetically enriching environments is distributed unequally across socioeconomic and racial lines.

Practical starting point: Identify one feature of your immediate daily environment — your workspace, bedroom, or commute — that reliably lowers your mood or raises your stress. Then identify one small, concrete change that would improve it. Environmental modifications do not need to be expensive or elaborate to be effective.

The Financial Dimension — Security, Sufficiency, and the Psychology of Money

The financial dimension encompasses one’s relationship with money — not simply income level or wealth, but financial security, literacy, planning, values alignment, and the psychological experience of economic life. It is the dimension that many holistic wellness frameworks underemphasize or ignore entirely — perhaps because it feels less philosophical than the others — and yet it is one that exerts consistent, powerful, and well-documented effects on psychological wellbeing and mental health.

The relationship between financial stress and mental health is bidirectional and robust. Financial insecurity activates the same threat-response systems in the brain that respond to physical danger — releasing cortisol, narrowing attention, and impairing the prefrontal executive function that supports planning, impulse control, and long-term thinking. Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir’s influential work on scarcity psychology demonstrated that the experience of not having enough — of any resource, including money — imposes a cognitive tax that reduces effective mental bandwidth, impairing decision-making in domains well beyond the scarcity itself. Financial stress does not merely accompany poor decisions; it causally contributes to them through specific neurobiological mechanisms.

The landmark research associated with economist Richard Easterlin — and subsequently updated and debated by researchers including Angus Deaton and Daniel Kahneman — examined the relationship between income and subjective wellbeing. The relationship is real but complex: financial sufficiency — having enough to meet basic needs and maintain a sense of security — contributes significantly to wellbeing, but beyond sufficiency thresholds, additional income shows diminishing returns on life satisfaction. What consistently matters more than absolute income is financial security — the sense that one’s financial situation is stable, manageable, and aligned with one’s values and goals — rather than wealth per se.

Financial wellbeing also encompasses the alignment between spending and values — a concept central to the “Your Money or Your Life” framework developed by Joe Dominguez and Vicki Robin, which positions conscious awareness of how one exchanges life energy for money as a path to both financial independence and authentic value alignment.

Practical starting point: Reflect honestly on whether your current financial situation aligns with your values. This does not require dramatic change — it requires honest awareness. Is your spending actually reflecting what matters most to you? Are there areas of financial anxiety you have been avoiding that would benefit from direct attention?

How the 8 Dimensions Interact — Why You Cannot Optimize Just One

The most important insight offered by the eight-dimension framework is not about any individual dimension — it is about the dynamic interdependence between all of them. No dimension operates in isolation. Deficit in one consistently undermines functioning in others, and strength in one reliably supports the others in ways that compound over time.

Consider a few illustrative interactions:

• Physical and emotional: Sleep deprivation directly impairs emotional regulation — the emotional dimension degrades when the physical dimension is neglected. Conversely, chronic emotional distress — particularly unprocessed grief or anxiety — activates physiological stress responses that compromise immune function, sleep quality, and cardiovascular health.
• Social and occupational: Workplace isolation undermines the social dimension, which in turn reduces engagement and performance in the occupational dimension. Strong collegial relationships are among the most reliable predictors of occupational satisfaction and productivity.
• Spiritual and emotional: A robust sense of meaning and purpose — the core of the spiritual dimension — provides a regulatory resource during periods of intense emotional difficulty. Research on post-traumatic growth suggests that individuals who are able to integrate traumatic experience into a coherent and meaningful narrative of their lives show greater psychological resilience than those who cannot.
• Financial and intellectual: Financial stress consumes cognitive bandwidth that would otherwise be available for intellectual engagement, curiosity, and creative thinking. Financial security creates the psychological space within which intellectual and creative flourishing becomes possible.
• Environmental and physical: Access to safe, natural, and aesthetically enriching environments supports physical health behaviors — exercise, sleep, nutrition — while chaotic or threatening environments undermine them through chronically elevated stress responses.

The practical implication is that the most effective approach to personal development is rarely to focus exclusively on one dimension while ignoring the others. Progress tends to occur at the intersection of multiple dimensions simultaneously — and the leverage points for change are often in the dimensions one has been most systematically neglecting.

FAQs about the 8 Dimensions of the Human Being

What are the 8 dimensions of the human being?

The eight dimensions of the human being are: physical (body, health, and movement), emotional (feelings, emotional regulation, and empathy), intellectual (curiosity, learning, and critical thinking), social (relationships, belonging, and connection), spiritual (meaning, purpose, and transcendence), occupational (work, purpose, and meaningful activity), environmental (physical surroundings and their effects on wellbeing), and financial (economic security, literacy, and values alignment). Together, these eight dimensions provide a comprehensive framework for understanding holistic human wellbeing — one that recognizes that flourishing is not reducible to any single aspect of human experience. The framework draws from positive psychology, developmental psychology, environmental psychology, and humanistic traditions, and is supported by substantial empirical research demonstrating that each dimension independently and significantly contributes to overall quality of life.

Where does the 8-dimension wellness model come from?

The eight-dimension wellness model has evolved from several converging traditions. Holistic health practitioners developed multidimensional wellness models throughout the 1970s and 1980s, with wellness pioneer Bill Hettler’s six-dimension model from the National Wellness Institute being one of the earliest formal frameworks. Subsequent researchers and practitioners expanded the model — typically from six to seven and eventually eight dimensions — incorporating occupational wellness, environmental wellness, and financial wellness as distinct domains recognized by evidence from organizational psychology, environmental psychology, and behavioral economics. The model also draws intellectual lineage from Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, Martin Seligman’s positive psychology and PERMA framework, and the World Health Organization’s expansive definition of health as “a state of complete physical, mental, and social wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” — a definition first adopted in 1948 and still formally maintained by the WHO today.

Which of the 8 dimensions has the greatest impact on overall wellbeing?

Research does not support the identification of a single most important dimension — because the dimensions are interdependent rather than additive. However, certain dimensions show particularly strong and consistent relationships with overall wellbeing across studies. The social dimension is among the most robustly supported: loneliness and social isolation are associated with effects on mortality risk comparable to smoking 15 cigarettes per day, according to research by Julianne Holt-Lunstad and colleagues. The physical dimension — particularly sleep — has unusually broad downstream effects on emotional, intellectual, and occupational functioning. The emotional dimension, when severely dysregulated, tends to dominate and impair all others. And the spiritual dimension, through its relationship to meaning and purpose, appears to function as a regulatory resource during periods of difficulty in other dimensions. The practical implication: assess your own eight dimensions honestly and invest most in the one you have been most neglecting — because that deficit is likely limiting your capacity in all the others.

How is the spiritual dimension different from religion?

The spiritual dimension in the eight-dimension framework is broader than religion and does not require any specific religious belief or practice. It refers to the human need for meaning, purpose, transcendence, and a sense of connection to something larger than the individual self — experiences that religion often provides, but that can also be accessed through secular philosophy, engagement with nature, artistic experience, humanitarian service, mindfulness practice, or the contemplation of scientific and existential questions. Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy — which addresses the spiritual dimension directly through meaning-making — was not a religious system, and its insights apply regardless of belief. Research on purpose in life consistently finds positive wellbeing effects whether purpose is expressed through religious, secular, relational, or professional commitments. What matters psychologically is the presence of meaning and purpose, not the specific framework through which they are experienced.

Can working on the 8 dimensions replace therapy or medical care?

No — and this distinction is important. The eight-dimension framework is an educational model for understanding holistic wellbeing, not a clinical treatment system. Engaging with the eight dimensions through reflection, lifestyle change, and intentional practice can support and enhance wellbeing — and is compatible with, and often supportive of, professional mental health and medical care. However, it does not replace professional diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, or medical treatment for specific psychological or physical conditions. If you are experiencing symptoms of a mental health condition, significant emotional distress, physical illness, or other clinical concerns, please consult a qualified healthcare or mental health professional. The eight-dimension framework is most usefully understood as a map for proactive wellbeing investment — a guide to where to direct attention and energy in a life that is already functionally stable — not as a substitute for professional care when professional care is needed.

How can I assess my own 8 dimensions of wellbeing?

A useful starting approach is to rate each of the eight dimensions on a simple scale from 1 (severely neglected or distressing) to 10 (actively cultivated and satisfying), and to write two or three honest sentences about each one. The dimensions that score lowest deserve the most attention first — not because they are the only ones that matter, but because deficits in one dimension tend to constrain the others. Look particularly for dimensions that you have been systematically avoiding or minimizing — these are often the ones where the most meaningful change is possible. Once you have an honest picture of where you stand across all eight dimensions, identify one or two small, specific, and manageable changes in your lowest-scoring areas and commit to implementing them for two weeks before reassessing. Wellbeing is not transformed by heroic overhauls — it is built through consistent small investments across multiple dimensions over time.

Bibliography

• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being. Free Press.
• Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. Norton.
• van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.
• Barrett, L. F. (2017). How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
• Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row.
• David, S. (2016). Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive in Work and Life. Avery.
• Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
• Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.
• Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
• Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much. Times Books.
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Harvard University Press.
• Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe: A moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297–314.